Senate Republicans Collins, Snowe and Specter join Democrats in passing $835 Billion Stimulus Bill (61-37); Conference expected to begin immediately to get bill to President by the end of the week.
Negotiators for Congress and the White House worked to narrow differences on an economic stimulus bill on Wednesday in hopes of clearing a bill for President Barack Obama’s signature by week’s end.
After unofficial talks stretching into the late evening on Tuesday, officials announced a formal meeting of negotiators for mid-afternoon in the Capitol.
Democratic aides said that Obama’s negotiating team had prevailed in restoring some lost funding for school construction projects during talks Tuesday, and had also increased aid to state governments above the $39 billion approved in a compromise with a handful of Senate GOP moderates.
Obama’s “Making Work Pay” tax credit would be reduced from $500 per worker to $400, with couples eligible for an $800 credit, instead of $1,000, a Democratic aide close to the talks said. The aide spoke on condition of anonymity because the negotiations are private.
Earlier Tuesday, the Senate sailed to approval of its $838 billion economic stimulus bill, but with only three moderate Republicans signing on and then demanding the bill’s cost go down when the final version emerges from negotiations.
Negotiators were working with a target of about $800 billion for the final bill, lawmakers said.
“That’s in the ballpark,” Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., said of the $800 billion figure late Tuesday.
The FY-2009 bill is still outstanding and will likely/hopefully be taken up after the stimulus issue is resolved. The bottom line is that government is still operating on the six month Continuing Resolution that is due to expire in early March. Northwest tribes have some things riding in the Omnibus Bill that hopefully will come through. If not the Omnibus fails, then a year long CR will be needed to enable us to use FY-08 enacted funds for the budget scheme for the year. As it is, there are three issues in play: the FY ’09 appropriations, the Administration’s FY ’10 budget and our FY ’10 strategy. Natural resource issues have not been addressed in the stimulus package to date, though there might still be some hope in conference for some dramatic change-so far, the honest analysis for tribal natural resources is not positive, although it has been a bit of a zoo in the halls of Congress, which the following articles help describe. The Obama Administration has sent positive vibes to Indian Country, but whether the rubber will meet the road in the tribal natural resource arena definitely remains to be seen.
This year, unlike many in the past, some very significant opportunities exist due in large part to the election of President Obama and a new and more democratic leaning 111th Congress, though the republicans have made it clear that they intend to be heard. The “up” changes have transformed government from being the “problem” into being a big part of the solution, although partisanship has reared its ugly head, along with an ugly economy and some unfortunate circumstances, e.g, back tax problems with some of the chosen cabinet members, to possibly create a short “honeymoon” for the Obama Administration. Nonetheless, hopes continue to run high that tribes may finally have an Administration smart enough to have the words tribe, natural resources and environment in its vocabulary. (One of the challenges that could materialize, in fact, is that the word “environment” and those who swing it around may do so without much focus on the fact that treaties are by Constitutional law, the supreme law of the land. President Obama has made it clear that reconstruction of the American economy will emphasize “green” technology-which is a good thing-as long as those advising him remember that he also promised to respect the sovereign rights of the indigenous people, and that these rights are based on the right to fish, hunt and gather.
In concert with the many changes in the nation’s capitol, Northwest tribes (in concert with Great Lakes tribes) have moved natural resource budget and policy issues forward in a coordinated way. As a result, Northwest tribal issues have moved front and center as the new year has begun. Northwest federal transition efforts have dovetailed neatly with the annual budget and appropriation process. Identifying problems is one thing, however; making them a reality is another. Thus, a strong, ongoing strategy is needed. Four foundation elements exist from which to build the Northwest tribal FY 2010 federal appropriation strategy: 1) A good list of funding needs developed for the FY ’09 funding cycle-likely to be similar in FY’10; 2) A coordinated NWIFC/CRITFC tribal budget paper has been constructed which supports new funding for the BIA tribal rights protection account; 3) Information has been provided to BIA and others regarding possible tribal natural resource spending under the economic stimulus program package being considered by the administration and congress and 4) A professionally published transition document that helps tell the tribal story.
Principle objectives include: Enhancing the Western Washington Fisheries Management base by $12 million; building earmarks for TFW of $1.74 million, PST of $1.8 million and Mass Marking of $2.4 million into the FY ’10 President’s budget; seek new tribal shellfish management funds of $4 million and new tribal groundfish management funds of $1.5 million; support the PST Chinook Annex funding request of $97 million; seek new wildlife management funds of $5 million; support the PCSRF fund to the highest achieved level of $110 million; seek$1.5 million for hatchery maintenance/rehabilitation and $3.34 for hatchery reform; seek $62.9 million for EPA gap funding; seek $500,000 in new tribal EPA funding in FY ’10 and $3 million in FY ’11; seek $3.2 million for water resource planning; seek $2 million for tribal participation in the Puget Sound Partnership and $2.57 million in the Coastal Ecosystem Initiative. All of this means a number of trips to Washington DC, coalition building, etc.
THE NEED FOR STIMULUS
“Let’s not make the perfect the enemy of the essential.”
-President Obama comment to Senate Republican critics of his stimulus legislation.
(Democratic leaders have pledged to have legislation ready for Obama’s signature by the end of next week.)
Each time economic numbers come out, the bull whose horns President Obama has eagerly snagged seems to get bigger and bigger and the idea of a presidential honeymoon seems more and more distant. A Commerce Department report just issued reports the economy shrank at a 3.8 percent pace in the final quarter of 2008, the worst showing since the early 1980s-but it wasn’t the worst of the news. Economists said they expect the current quarter, which ends March 31, will turn out to be the worst quarter for this recession. Some economists say they think the economy is shrinking by about 5 percent. Cutbacks in spending were evident across the land, as personal and commercial consumers kept their hands on their wallets. Spending on everything from cars to clothes dipped and overseas sales of U.S. goods seemed to dry into dust. House Minority Leader Boehner was quick to spot an opportunity, using the report to bash congressional Democrats for their handling of the economic stimulus package. “Democrats have taken a go-it-alone approach and produced a trillion-dollar package heavy on government spending but light on jobs,” he said. The question echoes in the minds and hearts of many. Is this a time for party politics?
In the Senate, there are plans for a make-or-break vote on its $820 billion stimulus plan. White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said the events provide “another chance for the president to talk directly to the American people” about why the stimulus plan is necessary. The two parties demonstrated some wide philosophical gaps on how to address an economic downturn that worsens by the week. Many say the focus needs to be on addressing what they say are the root causes of the recession: housing and financial services. Many have worried that the Senate’s economic stimulus bill fails to adequately address those and other “root causes of the economic slowdown.” Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-NV, defended the Obama proposals in their entirety but added that if republicans have amendments to improve the bill democrats would support them. “The unemployment claims reached 4.8 million . . . the highest on record, and the claims were 588,000 last week,” said Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. “This underscores the need for us to pass, and pass quickly, boldly the recovery package that passed the House.” Whether heads and hearts can come together remains to be seen, as does the true value of the stimulus package itself.
Those chatting outside of Congress often say Obama’s economic stimulus plan is in trouble. Conservative talking points are dominating the media’s coverage and it’s clear that there’s lots of misinformation around. All this, despite the fact that, as The Nation writes, “If enacted, the economic recovery plan will be one of the biggest and boldest pieces of progressive legislation in the past forty years.” According to advocates, the bill: Creates or saves 3 million to 4 million jobs in the next two years; averts “literally hundreds of thousands of teacher layoffs (doubling funding for the Department of Education); creates 500,000 green jobs and doubles clean energy production and immediately helps the unemployed get affordable health insurance. Underscoring the all-too-often political nature of some critics is their tendency to single out tiny fractions of the bill, such anti-smoking programs (less than one-ten-thousandth of the spending) and make it appear to be the centerpiece of the bill. And so, partisanship does go on. Yet many experts, even John McCain’s economic adviser, estimates that without the stimulus, unemployment would top 11% by 2010, the highest level since the Great Depression-outside of Indian Country that is.
TRIBES GET SOME ATTENTION, GENERALLY SPEAKING
The U.S. House of Representatives approved an $819 billion economic stimulus package along party lines that included nearly $3 billion for Indian Country programs. H.R. 1 will now go to the Senate, where a similar amount has already been approved for inclusion in the stimulus package. Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., has announced that the Senate Appropriations Committee had approved $2.8 billion in funding for improvements for Indian health services, education, roads and bridges, water, public safety, and housing. (Included in the appropriation is about $274 million in Bureau of Reclamation tribal water projects; $40 million in Bureau of Indian Affairs irrigation construction and repair; $25 million in BIA dams improvement; and $120 million in Safe Drinking and Clean Water Revolving Funds (the Secretary to fund the tribal set-aside under these revolving funds). Could this be a sign of things to come?
THE OBAMA BUDGET
Unfortunately, the new Obama budget will not be submitted as early as promised. Obama’s budget officials say their budget for 2010 won’t be submitted until late March or April. Rather like President Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, Obama intends to release a broad budget framework in mid-to-late February with his full-blown detailed budget to come later.
TROUBLE IN RIVER CITY
Faced with questions over non-payment of back taxes, Thomas Daschle, President Obama’s pick for Health and Human Services, has withdrawn his name from consideration. Daschle’s nomination drew praise from Indian Country leaders who felt he would have a better understanding of the health issues facing tribal governments. As a senator from South Dakota and as someone who had served on the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, Daschle had advocated for more health spending in Indian Country. He was with Obama throughout the campaign and was a strong advocate for acknowledgment of tribal sovereignty.
Daschle wasn’t the first sign of trouble in President Obama’s cabinet appointments. Unfortunately, another proven friend of the tribes, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson had withdrawn from his pending appointment as Commerce Secretary even before the Obama Inauguration, citing the distraction of a federal investigation into ties to a company that has done business with his state. Richardson stated unequivocally that he and his administration had acted properly in all matters, but that he had concluded the investigation would delay the confirmation process. President Obama’s Treasury Secretary nominee Timothy Geithner was approved, but not without a controversial hearing during which he apologized for what he called “careless mistakes” in failing to pay $34,000 in taxes earlier in the decade when he worked at the International Monetary Fund. More recently, the White House accepted the withdrawal of Nancy Killefer’s nomination to be deputy OMB director and the executive branch’s first chief performance officer. When she was nominated, the AP reported that the District of Columbia government had filed a $946.69 tax lien on her home for failure to pay unemployment tax on household help. She paid the lien five months after it was filed. The administration and Killefer had not answered questions about the tax error. There was even controversy over the selection of Larry Echohawk to head BIA, though Senator Daniel K. Inouye, D-HA, himself rose to Echohawk’s defense. “To those who have expressed these doubts, I would suggest that you might consider the personal qualities that a man or woman brings to public service, rather than placing too much emphasis on what he or she has had to do or say in their former official capacities.”
STOCKING THE CABINET
It’s official. President Obama has announced that Republican Sen. Judd Gregg, R-NH is his choice for Commerce secretary. (Food and Water Watch, a fringe environmental organization objected to the choice, calling Gregg a strong supporter of offshore aquaculture which it claims threatens marine ecosystems.) The announcement presumably means Democratic Gov. John Lynch has agreed to nominate a Republican to fill the Senate seat since Gregg apparently said he wouldn’t take the job if it would give Democrats a filibuster-proof 60th vote in the Senate.
KING COUNTY EXEC TO HUD
King County Executive Ron Sims is going to D.C. to take a job as deputy secretary, No. 2, at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Sims is going to Washington, D.C. intending to take a job as deputy secretary, No. 2, at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. He needs Senate confirmation. Rumors of his departure have been swirling for months. Sims, a big-picture guy, is a passionate booster of mass transit and environmental policies and has not been shy about supporting many tribal policies. The son of a preacher from Spokane, many have considered him one of the most articulate public officials to serve in the Northwest in recent history.
HOH TRIBE: MOVING TO HIGHER GROUND?
The Hoh Tribe is making a bid to move – not just a few houses but their entire village – to higher ground. If passed as expected, a bill scheduled to be introduced in Congress will award 37 acres of nearby Olympic National Park to the Hoh tribe and allow members to consolidate and place into permanent trusteeship other new lands they have purchased. The move would double the size of the reservation and place its inhabited areas well out of the way of damaging tides, floods, and tsunamis.
THE HOUSE NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE-IN REVIEW
So who’s taking charge of natural resource committees in Congress these days. On the House side, the House Committee on Natural Resources is being chaired by Rep. Nick Rahall, D-WV, chairing 49 member committee with quite a few familiar names on it, such as Rep. George Miller from California and Neil Abercrombie from Hawaii. The Washingtonians onboard include a democrat, Jay Inslee, and a republican, Cathy McMorris (Rodgers). Chairman Rahall has expressed delight at the makeup of the new committee, and he’s been keeping them busy. When it came to conducting hearings on offshore drilling, for example, the effort to make up for the shenanigans of yore resulted in a number of all-night commitments and the hearings are just getting started….groups invited to testify so far have been comprised largely of tourism, environmental and fishing groups-no tribes. However, they’re expected to go well into March. In January, Chairman Rahall introduced a joint resolution invoking the Congressional Review Act to overturn the highly controversial gutting of ESA, pushed through by the Bush Administration during its waning days in office. H.J. Res. 18 seeks to overturn the last-minute action by the Bush Administration to do away with the ESA’s cornerstone Section 7 consultation process, a move that essentially gives federal agencies an unacceptable degree of discretion to decide on their own whether or not to comply with the law. He has also called for the replacement of the current U.S. Commissioner to the International Whaling, amid growing criticisms that holdover political appointees of the Bush Administration were proposing to dismantle the current worldwide ban on commercial whaling. To stay connected with committee, live and archived video and audio webcasts, consult: http://resourcescommittee.house.gov.
On the Senate side, a primary committee of interest to tribes, including natural resource-related issues, is the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, chaired by Sen. Byron Dorgan, D, ND. He, and other such members as Sens. Daniel Inouye, Daniel Akaka, Tim Johnson, Tom Udall and John McCain have all championed various tribal issues through the years. The only Washingtonian on the committee is Sen. Maria Cantwell, a senator whose accolades in Indian Country may have been in somewhat short supply overall, but who does have some related credentials, such as her current fight to keep a year ’round rescue tugboat at Neah Bay. The Committee, while still getting organized, should prove to be a good focal point for tribal natural resource business, although it will be necessary to assure that treaty harvest rights and protection are fully considered as important environmental issues are considered. Tribes have a history of opposing offshore drilling because they realize the destruction that can be caused by an uncontrolled drilling industry. Thus, it is no doubt good news that the committee will continue its full oversight hearings on the issue well into March. The next hearings will be Feb. 24 and 25, both at 10 a.m., in the committee’s hearing room 1324 Longworth Office Building (witnesses are still TBA). For more information, stay tuned to Federal Update, or check into http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php.
IT DOESN’T HURT TO REVIEW
To view Obama’s pledge on tribal sovereignty, the trust responsibility and other principles in his tribal platform, click here: Preserve Sovereignty and the Trust Responsibility.
111th CONGRESS, FEBRUARY, 200
Bill-Lnk/Brief Sponsor/Status Initial Recomm./Description
|H.R.1– Supplemental Appropriations
(FY ending ’09)
|Rep Obey, David R. [WI-7
Latest Major Action: 2/10/2009 Resolving differences — House actions. Status: The Speaker appointed conferees: Obey, Rangel, Waxman, Lewis (CA), and Camp.
|Making supplemental appropriations for job preservation and creation, infrastructure investment, energy efficiency and science, assistance to the unemployed, and State and local fiscal stabilization, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009.|
ESA-Congressional Disapproval of DOI Rule
|Sponsor: Rep Rahall, Nick J., II [WV-3] (introduced 1/15/2009) Cosponsors (41)
Latest Major Action: 1/15/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Title: Providing for congressional disapproval of the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior and the Department of Commerce under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, relating to interagency cooperation under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
|H.R.14 : Ocean Acification||Sponsor: Rep Baird, Brian [WA-3] (introduced 1/6/2009) Cosponsors (5)
Committees: House Science and Technology Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Science and Technology.
|To provide for ocean acidification research and monitoring, and for other purposes.|
Oceans Policy + Strengthen NOAA
|Rep Rahall, Nick J., II [WV-3
Latest Major Action: 1/15/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources
|Providing for congressional disapproval of the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior and the Department of Commerce under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, relating to interagency cooperation under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.|
|H.R.21 : National policy for our oceans||Rep Farr, Sam [CA- Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Science and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
|To establish a national policy for our oceans, to strengthen the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to establish a national and regional ocean governance structure, and for other purposes.|
Omnibus Public Land Mgmnt Act
|Sen Bingaman, Jeff [NM]
Latest Major Action: 1/16/2009 Passed/agreed to in Senate. Status: Passed Senate with amendments by Yea-Nay Vote. 73 – 21. Held at desk.
|A bill to designate certain land as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, to authorize certain programs and activities in the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes.|
|H.R. 1907 The Coastal and Estuarine Land Protection Act||Jim Saxton of New Jersey
Latest Major Action: Latest Major Action: 10/2/2008 Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 1111.
|This bill would direct the Secretary of Commerce to establish a program to protect the environmental integrity of undeveloped coastal and estuarine areas. It would authorize the Secretary to make grants to coastal states with approved coastal zone management plans or National Estuarine Research Reserve units for the purpose of acquiring property that will further the goals of an approved Coastal Zone Management Plan or Program, a National Estuarine Research Reserve management plan, or a regional or state watershed protection plan. It would prohibit any more than 75% of the funding for any project under this Act from being derived from federal sources. It would reserve 15% of program funds for acquisitions benefiting the National Estuarine Research Reserve and authorize the acquisition of land and interests in land from willing sellers to improve the conservation of, and to enhance the ecological values and functions of, coastal and estuarine areas to benefit both the environment and the economies of coastal communities, and for other purposes.|
|H.R. 2421 The Clean Water Restoration Act,||Rep. James Oberstar of Minn.
Latest Major Action: 4/16/2008, House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee Hearings Held.
|Would clarify the original intent of Congress to protect all waters of the United States under the Clean Water Act. Current Status: The House Committee on Oversight and Government.|
|S.3036 The Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act||Sen. Barbara Boxer of California
7/8/2008 Senate floor actions. Status: Returned to the Calendar.
|direct EPA to establish a program to decrease emissions of greenhouse gases by, among other things, establishing a federal greenhouse gas registry, for which certain facilities must report information regarding fossil fuels and GHGs produced and consumed; and specified quantities of GHG emission allowances, which must decline for each year 2012 to 2050. Latest Major Action:|
|S.3552 The National Fish Habitat Conservation Act.||Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, . Latest Major Action: 9/24/2008 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.||Treats the causes of fish habitat decline by restoring healthy waterways by leveraging the efforts and funds of Federal Government agencies, state and local governments, conservation groups,fishing industry groups, and businesses and building partnerships aimed at addressing the nation’s biggest fisheries problems and fostering fish habitat conservation efforts , using a bottom-up multi-state approach of habitat improvement. The Act authorizes $75 million annually to be directed toward fish habitat projects supported by regional Fish Habitat Partnerships, based on the North American Wetlands Conservation Act model, and establishing a multi-stakeholder National Fish Habitat Board charged with recommending projects to the Secretary of Interior for funding|
|S.3608, The Salmon Stronghold bill||Sen. Maria Cantwell of Washington, Latest Major Action: 9/26/2008. Referred to Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.||Would establish a volunteer Salmon Stronghold Partnership program intended to complement the PCSR Fund in protecting wild Pacific salmon by proactively maintaining rivers (or salmon strongholds) by enhancing federal, tribal, state and local governments, public and land managers, fisheries managers, power authorities and NGO organizations. (In introducing the legislation, Sen. Cantwell said, “It is time to increase funding to recovery efforts, but also focus on prevention. It is time to adopt the kind of comprehensive solution that can solidify wild Pacific salmon’s place in American culture for generations to come.”)|
|H.R. 5263 The Encouraging Collaborative Restoration of Federal Forests Act||Rep. Raul Grijalva of Arizona
Latest Major Action: 7/10/2008 House Subcommittee on Operations, Oversight, Nutrition and Forestry Hearings Held.
|Would encourage collaborative, science-based ecosystem restoration of priority forest landscapes on federal lands under the jurisdiction of BLM and the Forest Service through a joint Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program.|
|H.R.5451 The Reauthorizing Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972||Rep. Madeleine Bordallo of Guam. Latest Major Action: 6/4/2008 House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.||Would amend the CZMA to authorize appropriations for grants under provisions relating to administration of a state’s coastal zone management program, resource management improvement, coastal zone enhancement, and national estuarine reserves. Would authorize the use of amounts in the CZMA Fund for expenses incidental to the administration of the Act and, beginning in FY2009, the portion of amounts appropriated to carry out provisions relating to administration of a state’s coastal zone management program and resource management improvement to be retained for use in implementing coastal zone enhancement grant provisions.|
|H.R.5741/( S.3231) , The High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act||Rep. Madeleine Bordallo of Guam, Latest Major Action: 7/9/2008 (7/8/08) Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.||Would amend the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to improve the conservation of sharks. House Natural Resources; Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation.|
|[H.R.6186.IH] , The Investing in Climate Action and Protection Act||Rep Edward Markey of Mass.,
Latest Major Action: 6/12/2008 Referred to House subcommittee on Energy and Environment.
|would among other things direct EPA to establish a program to decrease emissions of greenhouse gases by amending the Clean Air Act and establishing a federal greenhouse gas registry, for which affected entities must report information regarding fossil fuels and the gases produced, consumed, or sequestered (including specific quantities of emission allowances, which must decline for each year 2012 to 2050 and an emission allowance transfer system for specific covered facilities that emit more than 10,000 carbon dioxide equivalents in a year).|
|H.R.6537, The Sanctuary Enhancement Act of 2008||by Rep. Madeleine Bordallo of Guam, Latest Action: 7/24/2008 Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, and Oceans.||Would amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to require that the sanctuary system consist of national marine sanctuaries authorized or established by an Act of Congress (in addition to sanctuaries currently designated by the Secretary of Commerce) and marine national monuments. It sets forth the system’s mission and requires the Secretary to prepare, maintain, and update an ecological classification of the nation’s marine environment and an identification of maritime heritage resources as a national inventory of marine eco-regions and maritime heritage resources under U.S. jurisdiction. It also requires the Secretary to strive to include in the system by 2030 sites that will incorporate a full range of the nation’s marine eco-regions and rare and unique marine habitats, and a full range of maritime heritage resource areas. It modifies various requirements regarding the designation and implementation of marine sanctuaries and it expands the list of prohibited activities.|
|H.R.6689, The Chinook Nation Restoration Act||Rep. Brian Baird of Washington/
Latest Major Action: 7/31/2008 Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources.
|would restore Federal recognition to the Chinook Nation and makes the Chinook Tribe|
|[S.2301.IS ] The Native American Fish and Wildlife Management Act||Sen. Daniel K. Inouye of Hawaii||Improve the management of Indian fish and wildlife and gathering resources, e.g., requires Interior to establish the Tribal Fish and Wildlife Resource Management Program and the Alaska Native Fish and Wildlife Resource Management Program to conduct specified activities in support of the tribal administration of resources; direct the agency, upon the request of a tribe, to conduct a survey of the reservation or traditional use area to assess actual needs regarding management of fish and wildlife resources and the development of Fish and Wildlife Resource Management Plans by Indian tribal governments and Alaska Native fish and wildlife organizations and for plans to cooperatively govern the management and administration of tribal or Indian fish and wildlife resources by the Bureau, etc.|
|S.32 : Federal Energy Regulatory Commission||Sen Specter, Arlen [PA Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources||A bill to require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to hold at least 1 public hearing before issuance of a permit affecting public or private land use in a locality.|
|H.R.39 Arctic coastal plain||Sponsor: Rep Markey, Edward J. [MA-7] Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.||To preserve the Arctic coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska, as wilderness in recognition of its extraordinary natural ecosystems and for the permanent good of present and future generations of Americans.|
|H.R.49 Oil and gas leasing||Sponsor: Rep Young, Don [AK] Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Science and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.||To direct the Secretary of the Interior to establish and implement a competitive oil and gas leasing program that will result in an environmentally sound program for the exploration, development, and production of the oil and gas resources of the Coastal Plain of Alaska, and for other purposes.|
|H.R.135 : To establish the Twenty-First Century Water Commission||Sponsor: Rep Linder, John [GA-7] (introduced 1/6/2009) Cosponsors (7) Committees: House Natural Resources; House Transportation and Infrastructure
Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources+ Transportation and Infrastructure
|To establish the Twenty-First Century Water Commission to study and develop recommendations for a comprehensive water strategy to address future water needs.|
|S.140 minerals on public domain lands||Sen Feinstein, Dianne [CA Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources||A bill to modify the requirements applicable to locatable minerals on public domain lands, consistent with the principles of self-initiation of mining claims, and for other purposes|
|S.171 : Ocean Observations System||Sponsor: Sen Snowe, Olympia J. [ME] (introduced 1/8/2009) Committees: Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Latest Major Action: 1/8/2009 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
|A bill to develop and maintain an integrated system of coastal and ocean observations for the Nation’s coasts, oceans, and Great Lakes, to improve warnings of tsunami, hurricanes, El Nino events, and other natural hazards, to enhance homeland security, to support maritime operations, to improve management of coastal and marine resources, and for other purposes.|
|S.224 economic recovery through green jobs||Sponsor: Sen Stabenow, Debbie [MI] Committees: Senate Energy and Natural Resources
Latest Major Action: 1/13/2009 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
|: A bill to promote economic recovery through green jobs and infrastructure, and for other purposes.
(introduced 1/13/2009) Cosponsors (1)
|H.R.300 provide for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration||Sponsor: Rep Ehlers, Vernon J. [MI-3] Latest Major Action: 1/8/2009 Referred to the Committee on Science and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources||To provide for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and for other purposes.|
|H.R.325 : Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study||Sponsor: Rep Grijalva, Raul M. [AZ-7] Latest Major Action: 1/8/2009 Referred to House Natural Resources||To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the Avra/Black Wash Reclamation and Riparian Restoration Project.
House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
|H.R.365 Federal ocean and coastal mapping plan||Sponsor: Rep Bordallo, Madeleine Z. [GU] Cosponsors (9)Latest Major Action: 1/9/2009 Referred to House committees on Natural Resources, and Science and Technology||To direct the President to establish a program to develop a coordinated and comprehensive Federal ocean and coastal mapping plan for the Great Lakes and coastal state waters, the territorial sea, the exclusive economic zone, and the continental shelf of the United States, and for other purposes.|
|H.R.366 national ocean exploration program||Sponsor: Rep Farr, Sam [CA-17] Cosponsors (5) Latest Major Action: 1/9/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the Committees on Science and Technology and Natural Resources||To establish the and the national undersea research program within NOAA, to direct NOAA to establish and maintain an undersea research program, and for other purposes.|
|H.R.367 national integrated system of ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes observing systems||Rep Capps, Lois [CA Cosponsors (11) Latest Major Action: 1/9/2009 Referred to the Committees on Natural Resources and on Science and Technology||To establish a national integrated system of ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes observing systems, and for other purposes.|
|H.R.368 : coastal and estuarine areas||Sponsor: Rep Capps, Lois [CA Cosponsors (2)
Latest Major Action: 1/9/2009 Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
|To authorize the acquisition of land and interests in land from willing sellers to improve the conservation of, and to enhance the ecological values and functions of, coastal and estuarine areas to benefit both the environment and the economies of coastal communities, and for other purposes.|
|H.R.388 conservation of cranes||Sponsor: Rep Baldwin, Tammy [WI-2] (introduced 1/9/2009) Cosponsors (5)
Latest Major Action: 1/9/2009 Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
|To assist in the conservation of cranes by supporting and providing, through projects of persons and organizations with expertise in crane conservation, financial resources for the conservation programs of countries the activities of which directly or indirectly affect cranes and the ecosystems of cranes.|
|H.R.391 greenhouse gases||Sponsor: Rep Blackburn, Marsha [TN Cosponsors (9)
Latest Major Action: 1/9/2009 Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
|To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that greenhouse gases are not subject to the Act, and for other purposes|
|H.R.404 National Landscape Conservation System||Sponsor: Rep Grijalva, Raul M. [AZ- Cosponsors (23)
Latest Major Action: 1/9/2009 Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
|To establish the National Landscape Conservation System, and for other purposes.|
|H.R.493 Surface Mining Control||Sponsor: Rep Rahall, Nick J., II [WVLatest Major Action: 1/14/2009 Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.||To direct the Secretary of the Interior to promulgate regulations concerning the storage and disposal of matter referred to as “other wastes” in the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, and for other purposes.|
|H.R.509 Marine Turtle Conservation Act||Sponsor: Rep Brown, Henry E., Jr. [SC, Latest Major Action: 1/14/2009 Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.||To reauthorize the Marine Turtle Conservation Act of 2004.|
|H.R.585||Sponsor: Rep Lee, Barbara [CA-Cosponsors (5) Latest Major Action: 1/15/2009 Referred to the Committees on Science and Technology, Transportation and Infrastructure, Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Energy and Commerce||To direct the President to enter into an arrangement with the National Academy of Sciences to evaluate certain Federal rules and regulations for potentially harmful impacts on public health, air quality, water quality, plant and animal wildlife, global climate, or the environment; and to direct Federal departments and agencies to create plans to reverse those impacts that are determined to be harmful by the National Academy of Sciences.|